The Fog of War

The New
York Times reports that violence in Iraq is 'sprawling' and 'sweeping' and
'widespread' and has the statistics to back it up -- maybe. James Glanz and Thom Shanker
report:

BAGHDAD, Iraq, Sept. 28 - Over the past 30 days, more than 2,300 attacks by
insurgents have been directed against civilians and military targets in Iraq,
in a pattern that sprawls over nearly every major population center outside
the Kurdish north, according to comprehensive data compiled by a private
security company with access to military intelligence reports and its own
network of Iraqi informants.

The sweeping geographical reach of the attacks, from Nineveh and Salahuddin
Provinces in the northwest to Babylon and Diyala in the center and Basra in
the south, suggests a more widespread resistance than the isolated pockets
described by Iraqi government officials.

The "Times" source is the Special Operations Consulting-Security
Management Group Inc, an outfit based in Las Vegas which MSNBC
identifies as consisting largely of
former Army Rangers.

"If you look at incident data and you put incident data on the map,
it's not a few provinces, " said Adam Collins, a security expert and the
chief intelligence official in Iraq for Special Operations Consulting-Security
Management Group Inc., a private security company based in Las Vegas that
compiles and analyzes the data as a regular part of its operations in Iraq.

Damning. Or is it? In the next paragraph Adam Collins is quoted as saying:

The number of attacks has risen and fallen over the months. Mr. Collins
said the highest numbers were in April, when there was major fighting in
Falluja, with attacks averaging 120 a day. The average is now about 80 a day,
he said.

So what if the average number of attacks has fallen, part of the mixed
signals which the "Times" argues constitutes the "fog of
war"? Is it not undeniable that the insurgency was expanding and spreading as evidenced
by the Special Operations Consulting-Security Management Group Inc list of 2,300
attacks throughout Iraq this month, with 1,000 in Baghdad alone. And in other areas:

During the past 30 days those attacks totaled 283 in Nineveh, 325 in
Salahuddin in the northwest and 332 in the desert badlands of Anbar Province
in the west. In the center of Iraq, attacks numbered 123 in Diyala Province,
76 in Babylon and 13 in Wasit. There was not a single province without an
attack in the 30-day period.

Against this, the "Times" quotes those who argue that the
security situation is improving.

Pentagon officials and military officers like to point to a separate list
of statistics to counter the tally of attacks, including the number of schools
and clinics opened. They cite statistics indicating that a growing number of
Iraqi security forces are trained and fully equipped, and they note that
applicants continue to line up at recruiting stations despite bombings of
them. But most of all, military officers argue that despite the rise in bloody
attacks during the past 30 days, the insurgents have yet to win a single
battle. ...

In a joint appearance last week in the White House Rose Garden, Mr. Bush
and Dr. Allawi painted an optimistic portrait of the security situation in
Iraq. Dr. Allawi said that of Iraq's 18 provinces, "14 to 15 are
completely safe." He added that the other provinces suffer "pockets
of terrorists" who inflict damage in them and plot attacks carried out
elsewhere in the country. In other appearances, Dr. Allawi asserted that
elections could be held in 15 of the 18 provinces. Both Mr. Bush and Dr.
Allawi insisted that Iraq would hold free elections as scheduled in January.

Critics might argue that evidence from the Special Operations Consulting-Security Management Group Inc
make it hard to take the claims of President
Bush and Prime Minister Allawie seriously.  But are they lying? The
following table was constructed entirely from data contained in the
"Times" article, as modified by the graphic posted on their site. (Hat
tip CJR) The population and area of Iraq's provinces are taken
from the World
Gazeteer and a map of the Iraqi provinces can found at Global
Security Org.

The first thing to notice is that 2,139 of the 2,429 attacks took place in 6
of the 18 provinces. The numbers don't entirely add up in the "Times"
graphic but the discrepancy is small and may be due to errors in assigning some
incidents. The real hotbeds are Baghdad and areas to the northwest -- the
Sunni triangle. By far the greatest density of violence is in Baghdad, where
1,000 attacks have taken place in an 732 kilometers square.

Province	2004 Population	Area Size sq km	Attacks as per NYT article	Attacks per 100,000	Attacks per 1000 sq km
al-Anbar	1,260,200	138,501	332	26.35	2.40
Babil	1,454,700	6,468	76	5.22	11.75
Baġdād	6,677,000	734	997	14.93	1358.31
al-Basrah	1,916,000	19,070	87	4.54	4.56
Dahuk	496,100	6,553	1	0.20	0.15
Di Qar	1,458,500	12,900	6	0.41	0.47
Diyalā	1,397,500	19,076	123	8.80	6.45
Irbil	1,349,200	14,471	4	0.30	0.28
Karbala	731,500	5,034	76	10.39	15.10
Maysan	784,300	16,072	12	1.53	0.75
al Mutanna	537,700	51,740	2	0.37	0.04
an Najaf	954,100	28,824	7	0.73	0.24
Ninawa (Niniveh)	2,514,800	35,899	283	11.25	7.88
al Qadisiyah	924,900	8,153	1	0.11	0.12
Salah-ah-Din	1,113,400	26,175	325	29.19	12.42
as-Sulaymaniyah	1,677,500	17,023	1	0.06	0.06
at Tamim	927,200	10,282	83	8.95	8.07
Wasit	964,600	17,153	13	1.35	0.76
Totals	27,139,200	434,128	2,429

So everything checks out just as the New York Times article reported it. All
the facts are individually true, but Prime Minister Allawie's assertion that
most provinces are "completely safe" and that security prospects are
bright are also supported by those same facts. Such is the fog of war.